SINOMA INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING CO., LTD.

Decarbonization technologies
and application in China’s cement industry

As the world’s third largest source of industrial carbon emission, the cement industry faces an arduous task of carbon emission reduction. This paper systematically reviews the cutting-edge progress of decarbonization technologies in China’s cement industry, with a focus on analyzing key technical pathways and carbon reduction potentials, including energy efficiency improvement, clinker substitution, low-carbon clinker cement, CCUS, alternative raw materials and fuels, and new energy. The research shows that: Unless disruptive technologies emerge, the potential for further emission reductions through energy efficiency improvements will remain limited. China’s cement industry leads globally in clinker substitution, with an average clinker factor of 0.66. Calcined clay technology offers substantial carbon reduction benefits, while low-carbon clinker cement technologies – though still at a limited production scale – hold significant potential for energy savings and emission reductions, with growth expected as the market expands. CCUS remains essential for future decarbonization, yet faces challenges including high upfront investment, elevated capture costs, and unresolved CO2 utilization or storage. Meanwhile, China’s alternative fuel substitution rate remains below 10%, indicating considerable scope for improvement. New energy technologies also provide a promising pathway for green transformation and are poised to play a key role as technology advances and costs decline.

1 Introduction

As one of the most important basic materials in modern construction industry, cement faces the dual challenges of high energy consumption and intensive carbon emissions during its production process [1-2]. According to statistics, the average manufacture of 1 ton of cement currently produces about 0.6 ton of CO₂, making the cement industry the third largest source of CO₂ emissions after electricity and steel [3-5].

With the deterioration of global climate change and the global commitment of carbon neutrality goals, decarbonization in the cement industry has become a research hotspot in academia and industry community. This paper systematically sorts out the cutting-edge achievements of decarbonization technologies in the China’s cement industry in recent years, elaborates on the characteristics, carbon reduction effects and application prospects of various technical routes, and provides technical underpinning and applied guidance for the green transformation of the cement industry. The full text first analyzes the current situation of carbon emissions in traditional cement production, then analyzes the principles and application of major decarbonization technologies, including the outcome of these case studies in terms of energy efficiency, decarbonization and circularity, and finally concludes by summarizing the current challenges and outlining the future development directions.

 

2 Current Status of Carbon Emissions

from Traditional Cement Production

Cement manufacturing is an extremely complex process, and its carbon emissions vary depending on calcination processes, technology levels of equipment and cement types. Based on previous statistics on carbon emission distribution, see Table 1[6], clinker calcination section is the main source of CO₂ emissions, accounting for over 95% of total emissions, of which CO₂ produced by limestone calcination and decomposition accounts for 50-60% of total emissions, and CO₂ produced by fuel combustion accounts for 30-40%.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), global cement production was approximately 4 billion t in 2024, with CO₂ emissions of 2.4 billion t, accounting for 6-8% of global total emissions [7-8]. As the world’s largest cement producer, China’s cement production in 2024 was 1.825 billion t [9], resulting in an estimated 1.1 billion t of CO₂ emissions, accounting for 12-14% of the country’s total emissions. The data highlights the key role played by cement industry in carbon reduction process.

To promote sustainable industrial development and achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, a clear global decarbonization goal and roadmap has emerged, with the Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA) having released “Concrete Future-The GCCA 2050 Cement and Concrete Industry Roadmap for Net Zero Concrete” and “Net Zero Accelerator” plan [10]. China has proposed “3060” dual-carbon goals based on national conditions, and China Building Materials Federation has simultaneously promoted the construction of “Six-Zero” demonstration factories in the building materials industry. Key pathways to achieve these goals include improving energy efficiency, alternative raw materials and fuels, new low-carbon clinker cements, and CCUS and so on.

 

3 Research Progress on Decarbonization

Technologies

3.1 Energy Efficiency Improvement

Driven by national policies, particularly the promulgation of GB 16780 – 2021 “The Norm of Energy Consumption per Unit Product of Cement”, reducing carbon emissions in the cement production process has become a crucial issue that needs to be urgently addressed. Energy efficiency improvement technologies focus on optimizing energy efficiency throughout the entire process. Through multi-dimensional collaboration involving system energy consumption reduction, power consumption control, efficient waste heat recovery, and digital & intelligent management and control, significant effects of carbon emission cut can be achieved.

In terms of clinker calcination, the integrated application of multiple technologies has enabled major breakthroughs in energy efficiency improvement. Advanced technologies and equipment such as new thermal insulation materials (nanoplates, aerogels), gradient combustion self-denitrification calciners, fourth-generation coolers, and high-efficiency low-resistance preheater systems have been adopted. These measures can drive down heat consumption to 620-640 kcal/kg.cl, and significantly improve clinker cooling efficiency and heat recovery rate [11-13]. In terms of grinding, the most advanced roller press final grinding technology and equipment are used. Under conditions of moderate grindability, power consumption of raw meal grinding system is reduced to 12 kWh/t. The power consumption of cement final grinding system equipped with multi-rotor separators is as low as 21 kWh/t, and that of fuel vertical roller mill grinding system is as low as 25 kWh/t [14-15]. In terms of environmental protection, the use of high-efficiency bag filters can control dust emission concentration below 5 mg/Nm³. Wet desulfurization technology can meet the ultra-low emission requirements of SO₂ in the scenarios of sulfur-containing raw materials. The adoption of flexible SCR nitrogen oxide treatment schemes, such as high-temperature high-dust, medium-temperature medium-dust, and high-temperature low-dust schemes, can stably meet the strict requirements of NOx emission < 50 mg/Nm³ [16-17]. In addition, waste heat recovery and intelligent control technologies have further improved the energy efficiency system. With the widespread application of waste heat power generation facilities, the power generation of clinker per ton reaches 28-32 kWh, which can meet the electricity demand of calcination system and realize the isolated operation of calcination system. The integrated application of intelligent control systems, digital carbon emission control systems and BIM technology can reduce heat consumption by more than 3%, achieve a grinding intelligent system operation rate of over 98%, and reduce energy consumption by more than 5% [17-18].

At present, these technologies have been applied on a large scale in new and upgrading projects in China. Through the collaboration of production process optimization, environmental protection upgrading, waste heat recovery and utilization, and intelligent management and control, a full-process energy efficiency optimization system has been built. Specific application cases can refer to Figure 1-2 and Table 2-4 [19].

At present, the existing technical indicators of clinker heat consumption and comprehensive grinding power consumption in China’s cement industry have reached the international advanced or even leading level. Unless disruptive technologies such as fluidized bed, electrification, and solar energy emerge, the potential for further emission reduction through this technical pathway will be limited.

 

3.2 Clinker Substitution

Clinker substitution technology involves replacing clinker with slag, fly ash, and other pozzolanic admixtures, while ensuring no adverse impact on cement quality and performance, represents a crucial pathway for low-carbon development in the cement industry. China’s cement industry leads globally in the application and development of this technical route, with the current average clinker factor at 0.66.

Calcined clay technology is currently one of the international hotspots. Without compromising performance, calcined clay combined with limestone can replace up to 30-50% of clinker and even more depending on the activity and strength grade of the resultant cement. The new ternary system cement LC3 (Limestone-Calcined Clay-Cement) is composed of limestone, calcined clay, gypsum, and clinker. In this cement, limestone reacts with calcined clay to form calcium carboalumination hydrates, which promotes cement hydration. It maintains performance comparable to ordinary Portland cement even at a clinker substitution rate as high as 50% [20].

Current calcined clay processes include rotary kiln, fluidized bed, and suspension calcination technologies. Among these, the suspension calcination process is considered the optimal technical route available today due to its significant reduction in production energy consumption. Sinoma International independently developed and built the 600 t/d kaolin suspension calcination production line in Zhenjiang (Figure 3), achieving a breakthrough in large-scale suspension calcination production of kaolin tailings in China. The calcination heat consumption is approximately 450 kcal/kg, more than 40% lower than that of rotary kiln systems. Therefore, using calcined clay to replace 30%-50% of clinker in cement production achieves extremely significant carbon emission reduction effects, and the benefits generated from carbon emission reduction can offset the production cost of calcined clay.

Enhancing clinker quality and optimizing grinding technology are also the key approaches to achieving low-carbon targets. Improving clinker quality is undoubtedly the primary strategy for enabling increased addition of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) without compromising the key performance of cement. The core technical pathways for enhancing clinker quality focus on four aspects: optimization of raw material proportions, advancement of calcination processes, application of mineralizers, and implementation of intelligent control systems. Meanwhile, separate grinding technology, developed based on hydration characteristics of cement, offers an effective solution for reducing clinker content. By implementing differentiated grinding control for various materials, vertical roller mill or roller press are employed for separate grinding of materials such as clinker, gypsum, and limestone. An exemplified process flow is illustrated in Figure 4. Practical applications demonstrate that this technology can further reduce proportion of clinker by 10%~15%, thus effectively lowering carbon emission intensity [21-22].

 

3.3 Low-Carbon Cement

The four primary mineral phases in ordinary Portland cement clinker are associated with wwdifferent levels of CO₂ emissions during their formation, with Alite (C3S) being the largest contributor (Table 5). In accordance with the national standard for Portland cement clinker and common production practices, it is also the most predominant phase in the clinker [23]. For this reason, a variety of new low-carbon cement types have emerged internationally, which achieve emission mitigation by optimizing and/or introducing new mineral composition and reducing calcination temperature.

Representative technologies and products originating from China include calcium sulfoaluminate cement (CSA), high belite cement (HBC), and belite-calcium sulfoaluminate cement (BCSA). Their designed chemical and mineral compositions are summarized in Table 6. Specifically, each cement type possesses distinct technical characteristics, as outlined in Table 7 [23].

By innovating in mineral composition, lowering calcination temperatures, and enabling higher clinker substitution rates, these new low-carbon clinker cement systems significantly reduce carbon emissions during production. They thus provide multiple technical pathways for the low-carbon transition of the cement industry. Although their current production volume remains limited, their potential for energy savings and emission reduction is substantial and is expected to grow steadily as the market for these technologies expands.

 

3.4 CCUS

Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) technology is a critical technological solution that will be indispensable for decarbonization in the future. The main application directions currently are post-combustion carbon capture and in-combustion carbon capture (specifically oxy-fuel combustion technology) [24-26].

Specifically, although carbon capture technology of post-combustion chemical absorption has a wide range of applications, its total energy consumption is relatively high; while oxy-fuel combustion technology has attracted extensive attention due to high feasibility and low-cost advantages in existing cement plants [27-30]. The oxy-fuel combustion carbon emission reduction technologies in the cement industry are mainly divided into oxygen-enriched combustion (OEC) technology and oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) technology, as shown in Figure 5: OEC technology uses oxygen-enriched air with an oxygen content higher than ordinary air (21%) as combustion-supporting agent to enhance fuel combustion efficiency and heat utilization rate; OFC technology mixes high-concentration O₂ prepared by air separation devices with 60%~70% recycled flue gas to form an O₂/CO₂ atmosphere, replacing air as the oxidant. The high-volume fraction CO₂ generated by combustion can be directly utilized or stored after compression and purification [31-36].

In terms of technical research and application, European Cement Research Academy (ECRA) has established a parallel direction of partial oxy-fuel combustion (using pure oxygen combustion in calciner) and full oxy-fuel combustion (using pure oxygen combustion in the whole process, including calciner and rotary kiln) [37-42]; The CEMCAP project funded by the EU “Horizon 2020” has developed advanced carbon capture technology to provide a basis for full-scale transformation of cement production processes [42-45]. While the AC2 project has carried out industrial retrofitting demonstrations in companies such as HeidelbergCement and Lafarge Holcim, forming an upgrading guide for existing cement plants. In response to the national “dual-carbon” goals, in 2018, Conch Cement built a demonstration line for carbon capture and purification from cement kiln flue gas in WH cement plant, which pioneered the recycling and utilization of CO₂ in the global cement industry and set a leading pilot benchmark for carbon emission reduction in the industry. In 2022, Sinoma International built the first full oxy-fuel combustion pilot test platform, and its output was applied in the 200000 t/a demonstration project of CUCC (QZ) [46]. Currently, leading enterprises such as China National Building Materials (CNBM) and Conch Cement have built or plan to carry out relevant demonstration projects. The CCUS projects under construction or in operation in China’s cement sector and the main applied technologies are shown in Table 8 [47].

However, CCUS faces significant challenges, including high upfront investment, persistently high carbon capture and utilization costs, and the unresolved issue of how to utilize or store the captured CO₂.

 

3.5 Alternative raw materials and fuels

Alternative raw material and fuel technologies in cement production include the substitution of calcium-based raw materials, the use of alternative fuels, and co-processing waste in rotary kilns. A representative case of non-carbonate calcium material utilization is the application of carbide slag. Currently, the alternative fuel substitution rate in China’s cement industry remains below 10%, indicating substantial potential for future emission reduction.

3.5.1 Alternative raw materials

In cement production, the high-temperature decomposition of calcareous raw materials is a significant source of carbon emissions. Alternative raw materials can effectively reduce emissions, providing a feasible pathway for low-carbon transformation in cement industry.

Cement production uses limestone as main calcareous raw material, with approximately 1.3 tons of raw materials consumed by producing one ton of clinker. A large amount of CO₂ is generated during its decomposition. However, in practice, as long as raw material does not decompose or its decomposition products do not contain CO₂ during application and can provide CaO, it can be used to produce qualified clinker. Information on common alternative raw materials is shown in Table 9.

China has long engaged in innovative practices regarding alternative raw materials. Specifically, the application of carbide slag as a substitute is relatively mature. For example, Sinoma International has designed the 300 000 t/a carbide slag cement production line in Yibin. These projects have achieved reliable utilization of carbide slag through technical transformation. Silica-calcium slags such as fly ash and coal gangue, where calcium elements do not exist in the form of CaCO₃, can theoretically cut carbon emissions from fuel combustion required for CaO decomposition and from carbonate decomposition. They also offer the advantages of reducing carbon emissions and improving land utilization.

Steel slag can improve the burnability of raw meals and reduce fuel combustion emissions. However, variations in composition due to different steelmaking processes require adjustments to raw meal formulations. Otherwise, it may cause instability in cement quality, limiting its reuse [48]. Regarding quartz sludge, CUCC has replaced sandstone with quartz sludge in its 4600 t/d production line through technical transformation, which improved the grindability and compositional stability of raw meal and significantly enhanced production efficiency.

Papermaking sludge can not only be used as raw material but also, due to relatively high calorific value, can replace part of fuel. Theoretically, for every 1% wet papermaking sludge incorporated, the physical coal consumption per ton of clinker can be reduced by 1.91 kg. In addition, the industry has actively promoted the use of bulk solid wastes such as phosphogypsum for raw material substitution in recent years. For instance, the WF phosphogypsum resource decomposition project designed by Sinoma International has achieved 100% replacement of limestone.

In conclusion, the use of carbide slag, silica-calcium slag, steel slag, and other materials to replace traditional calcareous raw materials can not only meet the demand for CaO in cement production but also reduce carbon emissions at the source while realizing the resource utilization of industrial solid wastes.

 

3.5.1 Alternative Fuels

As an important means for cement industry to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and lower carbon emissions as well as harmful gas emissions, fuel substitution technology, which replaces traditional fossil fuels with renewable energy sources such as waste or biomass, has been adopted worldwide. Meanwhile, the exploration of new alternative fuels such as hydrogen energy has opened up additional pathways for low-carbon transformation of cement industry.

Specifically, fuel substitution technology targets waste or biomass with certain calorific value as substitutes. Internationally, Thermal Substitution Rate (TSR) is commonly used to measure the substitution ratio, i.e., the proportion of heat provided by alternative fuels in the total heat of kiln during calcination process. In terms of application status, the average fuel substitution rate in EU cement industry has approached 40%. However, the utilization rate of alternative fuels in China is less than 10%, mainly limited by the small coverage of waste classification areas and the lack of unified grading standards for waste components [49]. In specific applications, municipal solid waste has a wide range of sources, and processing it into Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) can improve the stability of fuel quality. Currently, China mainly adopts two feeding methods: single-point direct injection or pre-combustion before entering decomposing furnace (the characteristics of each method are shown in Table 10). In 2024, HX cement has achieved a stable fuel substitution rate of over 60%, with comprehensive energy consumption of clinker below 50 kg of standard coal per ton. The WAXF project, as shown in Figure 6, constructed by Sinoma International, establishes a new comprehensive circular economy model anchored in cement kiln co-processing. This system integrates the treatment of diverse waste streams—including industrial solid waste, municipal solid waste, hazardous waste, and construction waste—enabling the company’s strategic evolution from a traditional building materials manufacturer to an urban environmental service provider and green materials supplier. This initiative presents a replicable demonstration pathway for the industry’s green transformation.

In addition, hydrogen energy has become a research hotspot due to its high calorific value (142 MJ/kg, 4-7 times than coal) and zero carbon emission characteristics. Its technical pathways include pure hydrogen combustion, hydrogen-coal co-combustion, and hydrogen-based synthetic fuels. Among them, pure hydrogen combustion needs to solve the problems of flame stability and NOx control, while co-combustion technology (e.g., 5%-10% hydrogen blending ratio) can be used as a transitional scheme to reduce transformation costs. Data from the European Cement Association shows that for every 10% increase in the hydrogen substitution rate, CO₂ emissions per ton of clinker can be reduced by approximately 8%-12% [50]. Companies such as LafargeHolcim and HeidelbergCement have achieved nearly 100% net-zero fuel operation in Europe. In China, BBMG Research Institute has completed an industrial test with 70% hydrogen concentration, and Sinoma international is tackling the technology of co-combustion of hydrogen and alternative fuels, aiming for substitution rate of over 80%. However, the large-scale promotion of hydrogen energy is still restricted by the economic efficiency and infrastructure shortage [51].

In summary, fuel substitution technology provides multiple options for low-carbon development of cement industry, and international application has verified its feasibility and emission reduction potential. Although the current substitution rate in China is relatively low, with technological innovation and system improvement, coupled with breakthroughs in new fuels such as hydrogen energy, fuel substitution technology is expected to play a pivotal role in promoting the green transformation of cement industry and helping achieve decarbonization goals.

 

3.6 New Energy Technologies

New energy technologies in cement industry, centered on electric calcination and renewable energy (wind power/photovoltaics) combined with energy storage for peak shaving and valley filling, provide clean energy solutions for industry’s low-carbon transformation. Currently, there have been certain application, but bottlenecks such as land constraints and economic viability still exist.

Specifically, electric calcination technology replaces fossil fuels through electromagnetic induction heating, plasma heating, and other methods, which is expected to directly eliminate fuel combustion emissions that account for 40% of cement carbon emissions. However, it is still in the pilot or demonstration stage. The wind-solar-storage integration technology combines photovoltaic, wind power, and energy storage systems. It utilizes idle space in cement plants for photovoltaic power generation, builds wind power generation adjacent to the plant area, and is equipped with large-scale energy storage battery systems. Through intelligent microgrid management, it achieves multi-energy complementarity, which can increase penetration rate of green electricity to 30%-40% [52].

In terms of application status, Heidelberg has actively laid out wind and photovoltaic projects, deployed lithium-ion energy storage systems combined with intelligent microgrid technology to stabilize electricity price fluctuations and improve the utilization rate of green electricity, and actively explored the path of producing hydrogen from wind and photovoltaic power to replace fossil fuels. Cemex adopts hydrogen calcination and electric heating kiln technologies to reduce reliance on fossil fuels, reducing the carbon footprint of some products by 70%. Domestic leading enterprises such as CNBM and Conch Cement have also actively made layouts, as detailed in Table 11. Industry data shows that wind-solar-storage systems can reduce electricity costs by 18-25% and reduce carbon emission intensity by 10-15% [53].

However, this technology faces two major bottlenecks: land resource constraints, as each MW of photovoltaic installed capacity requires 1.2-1.8 hectares of land [54]; and economic constraints, with the investment payback period of projects mostly being 7-9 years [55]. Nevertheless, with the improvement of photovoltaic module efficiency and the reduction of energy storage costs, its application potential will be further released.

In summary, new energy technologies provide an important pathway for the green transformation of cement industry. Despite existing challenges, with technological progress and cost optimization, they are expected to play a key role in the low-carbon development of cement industry.

4 Summary and Outlook

Under the strategic guidance of China’s “dual-carbon” goals, China cement industry has developed a comprehensive value chain innovative carbon reduction system that integrates process innovation, equipment upgrades, new energy adoption, and carbon management. The industry is now at a critical juncture, transitioning toward deep decarbonization and carbon neutrality after the peak CO2 emission reached in 2020, yet it continues to face two major challenges. Technologically, innovation bottlenecks persist—CCUS remains costly, while key areas such as hydrogen safety and co-processing of alternative fuels require further breakthroughs and demonstration. Systematically, policy mechanisms and carbon accounting standards still need strengthening and acceleration.

To achieve the long-term vision of carbon neutrality, China cement sector must pursue strategic advances in both global technological collaboration and domestic industrial transformation. Top-level design should focus on improving carbon pricing, taxation mechanisms, and industry standards. At the industrial ecosystem level, vertical integration and horizontal cooperation should be enhanced to enable coordinated emission reductions across the entire value chain—from raw material extraction to concrete application. Technologically, greater emphasis must be placed on integrated innovation across multiple pathways, overcoming cost barriers in key technologies, and scaling up mature solutions to improve cost-effectiveness.

The journey to carbon neutrality for China’s cement industry is both challenging and promising. It is a complex systemic undertaking that demands cross-sector collaboration, the integration of diverse technological routes, and the joint creation of a circular economic ecosystem and value chain. There are no simple solutions—success will depend on sustained innovation, mutually beneficial partnerships, and the cumulative impact of incremental progress.

www.sinoma.com.cn

REFERENCES
[1] International Energy Agency. Technology Roadmap: Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry [R]. 2018.
[2] Scrivener K L, et al. Eco-efficient cements[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 114:2-26.
[3] International Energy Agency. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector [R]. Revised version, October 2021.
[4] China Building Materials Federation. Carbon Emission Report of China‘s Building Materials Industry (2020) [R]. 2021.
[5] Habert G, et al. Environmental impacts in the cement industry[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2020, 1(11):559-573.
[6] National Development and Reform Commission. Implementation Plan for Carbon Peak in the Building Materials Industry [Z]. 2022.
[7] Gartner E, et al. Reduction of CO2 emissions in concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2015, 78:126-142.
[8] Jonathan Woetzel, Xu Hao, Wang Xiaofan, et al. „China Accelerates Towards Carbon Neutrality“ Cement Chapter: Carbon Emission Reduction Paths for Cement Industry [EB/OL]. [2025-08-03].
[9] U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries: Cement[R]. January 2025.
[10] Ian Tiseo. Global CO2 Emissions from Cement Manufacturing, 1960-2023 [EB/OL]. (2025-03-13).
[11] National Bureau of Statistics. Energy Production in December 2024 [EB/OL]. Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics, 2025-01-17 [2025-08-03].
[12] Ni Yaling, Xiao Ying, Nie Qing, et al. Research on Carbon Neutrality Paths for China‘s Cement Industry [R]. China Building Materials Academy Co., Ltd., 2023.
[13] Liu Luoqian, Lei Yalin, Zhi Shujie, et al. CCUS Technology Emission Reduction Potential and Optimal Deployment at the Point Source Level in China‘s Cement Industry [J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 26 (4): 56-67.
[14] Global Cement and Concrete Association. The GCCA 2050 Cement and Concrete Industry Roadmap for Net Zero Concrete. [R], 2021.
[15] Global Cement and Concrete Association. Net Zero Accelerator. 2022-04-01.
[16] State Council. Action Plan for Carbon Peak Before 2030 [Z]. 2021.
[17] China Building Materials Federation. Guidelines for the Construction of „Six-Zero“ Demonstration Factories in the Building Materials Industry [R]. 2022..
[18] China Building Materials Federation. Guidelines for Carbon Emission Reduction Technology Paths in the Cement Industry [R]. 2022.
[19] FLSmidth. Six-stage preheater performance report [R]. Copenhagen, 2022.
[20] Kääntee, U., et al. Advanced calciner designs for NOx reduction [J]. ZKG International, 2021, 74(5): 52-61.
[21] KHD Humboldt Wedag. Fourth-generation cooler whitepaper [R]. Germany, 2023.
[22] Wang Jianjun, Li Hua. Research on the Application of Nano Insulation Materials in Cement Rotary Kilns [J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2020.
[23] Zhang Wei, et al. Analysis of the Impact of the Fourth-Generation Grate Cooler on Clinker Heat Consumption [J]. Cement Technology, 2021.
[24] CNBM. Roller press final grinding system test data [R]. Beijing, 2023.
[25] „Industrial Application of Large-Scale Raw Meal Roller Press Final Grinding System“ [J]. Equipment Technology, 2021 (5): 1-4.
[26] Xinjiang Wujiaqu Qingsong Building Materials Co., Ltd. First Application in China, The Technical Transformation Project of Cement Plant Was Successfully Completed [EB/OL].
[27] Tianjin Cement Industry Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd. Research and Application on Vertical Roller Mill for Cement Final Grinding Technology [R]. 2009.
[28] European Cement Research Academy. Dust Emission Control Technologies [R]. Düsseldorf: ECRA, 2020.
[29] GB 4915-2013 “Emission standard of air pollutants for cement industry” [S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2013.
[30] HJ 2302-2018 “Guideline for available techniques of pollution prevention and control for pulp and paper industry” [S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2018.
[31] Wang Xiaoming, Li Huaqiang. Engineering Application of New High-Efficiency Bag Filters in Cement Plants [J]. China Environmental Protection Industry, 2020(5): 45-49.
[32] Zhang Wei, et al. Research on Ultra-Low Emission Technology of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization in Cement Kilns [J]. Environmental Engineering, 2021, 39(3): 112-116.
[33] China Building Materials Academy. White Paper on the Application of SCR Denitration Technology in Cement Industry [R]. 2022.
[34] Chen Gang, et al. Ammonia Escape Control Strategy for SCR Denitration Systems in Cement Kilns [J]. Cement Technology, 2022(4): 78-82.
[35] Zhang, L., et al. SCR optimization for cement kilns [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 380: 134952.
[36] China Cement Association. Technical Specifications for Waste Heat Power Generation in Cement Kilns: T/CCTA 001-2020 [S]. Beijing: China Building Materials Industry Press, 2020.
[37] GB/T 50588-2017 “Standard for design of waste heat power generation in cement plants” [S].
[38] Siemens. Digital twin application in cement plants [R]. Munich, 2023.
[39] Wang Jianjun, et al. Energy-Saving Effect Analysis of Intelligent Transformation of Cement Grinding Systems [J]. China Cement, 2023(2): 56-60.
[40] Huaxin Cement Co., Ltd. Application Report on Intelligent Control Systems for Cement Production [R]. 2022.
[41] Li Zhiqiang, et al. BIM-Based Digital Energy Efficiency Management System for Cement Plants [J]. Automation Instruments, 2022, 43(5): 89-93.
[42] Sui Mingjie, Zhang Jiangtao, Liu Yunqing, et al. Promoting Green Development of Cement Industry with Advanced Technologies and Equipment [J]. Cement Technology, 2025, 1(4): 1-11.
[43] Taylor H F W. Cement Chemistry (3rd Edition) [M]. London: Thomas Telford, 2022: 210-215.
[44] Ghosh, S.N. Advances in Cement Technology [M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1983.
[45] Hewlett, P.C., et al. Lea‘s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete (5th ed.) [M]. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2019.
[46] Zhang, L., et al. „Effect of mineralizers on clinker formation at lower temperatures“ [J]. Cem. Concr. Res., 2020, 135: 106120.
[47] FLSmidth. AI-based Process Optimization in Cement Plants [R]. Copenhagen, 2023.
[48] Li Qiang, et al. Real-Time Prediction Model of Raw Meal Composition Based on XRF-NIR Combination [J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2022, 43(8): 112-120.
[49] Scrivener, K.L., et al. „The role of particle size distribution in cement blends“ [J]. Cem. Concr. Res., 2018, 112: 19-34.
[50] Bentz, D.P., et al. „Packing density and chemical activation in hybrid cements“ [J]. Constr. Build. Mater., 2021, 291: 123355.
[51] Zhang Wei, et al. Construction and Verification of a Close-Packed Model for Cement Particles [J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2023, 26(2): 156-164.
[52] CNBM. Ultra-fine Grinding Technology for Slag/Fly Ash [R]. Beijing, 2023.
[53] Wang et al. [ J]. Study on cement grinding technology based on particle size distribution optimization. Silicate Bulletin, 2023,42 (3): 1021-1029.
[54] China Building Materials Academy. Application Guidelines for Separate Grinding Technology of Cement [M]. Beijing: China Building Materials Industry Press, 2022: 56-78.
[55] GARTNER E, SUIT. Alternative cement clinkers[J]. Cem, Concr. Res.,2018, 114:27-39.
[56] Wei Liying, Wang LAN, Yan Bilan. New Research Progress of Low-Carbon Cement at Home and Abroad [J]. Cement, 2014 (12): 1-3.
[57] China Building Materials Academy. A High Belite Cement Clinker and its Preparation Process: China, 98100581.0 [P]. 1998-09-23.
[58] SUI Tongbo, GUO Suihua, LIU Kezhong, et al. Research on high belite cement [C]//4th Beijing International Symposium on Cement and Concrete. Beijing: China Academic Publishers, 1998: 145-148.
[59] Fang Yonghao, Yang Nanru. The effect of different ions on the stability and microstructure of ß-C 2 S [J]. Silicate Bulletin, 1993 (6): 7-11.
[60] Sui Tongbo, Liu Kezhong, Wang Jing, et al. Study on the Properties of High Belite Cement [J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 1999, 27 (4): 488-492.
[61] Feng Peizhi, Li Jianxi. Research on the Influence of Trace Elements on the Hydration Activity of C2S [J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 1994, 16 (3): 32-37.
[62] Lu Weijie, Pan Changyu, Lu Lingchao. Research on Activation Technology of High Belite Cement [J]. Cement Guide for New Century, 2007 (2): 31-35.
[63] Wolfgang Dienemann, Dirk Schmitt, Frank Bullerjahn, et al. Belite-Calciumsulfoaluminate-Ternesite (BCT) - a new low carbon clinker technology[C]//VDZ Congress 2013 (7th International VDZ Congress „Process Technology of Cement manufacturing“).
[64] Heidelberg cement Ag. Method for producing ternesite-belite calcium sulfoaluminate clinker, WO 2013023731 A2.
[65] Heidelberg cement Ag. Calcium sulfoaluminate cement with ternesite, WO 2013023728 A2.
[66] Zhang L, Su M, Wang Y, et al. Preparation and properties of high belite sulphoaluminate cement with low energy consumption [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 120: 164-175.
[67] Sui, T., Sui, H., & Wang, B. Belite-based low-carbon clinker cements[J]. International Cement Review, 2020(3):55-60.
[68] Meenakshi Sharma, Shashank Bishnoi, Fernando Martirena, et al. Limestone calcined clay cement and concrete: A state-of-the-art review[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2021(149):1-13.
[69] Fu Lijuan. Application Prospects of New Low-Carbon Cement LC3 (Part 1 and Part 2) [J]. China Cement, 2020 (9): 98-102.
[70] JORDAL K, VOLDSUND M, STØRSET S, et al. CEMCAP-making CO2 capture retrofittable to cement plants[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017,114:6175-6180.
[71] JORDAL K, ABANADES C, BERSTAD D, et al. D2.11 CEMCAP strategic conclusions-progressing CO2 capture from cement towards demonstration[R]. Norway: SINTEF, 2019: 8-17.
[72] PLAZA M G, MARTÍNEZ S, RUBIERA F.CO2 capture, use, and storage in the cement industry: State of the art and expectations[J]. Energies,2020,13(21):5692.
[73] ALCAZER G, BANNOC, FERREIRA J M B, et al. ECRA CCS project-report on phase III [R]. Germany: European Cement Research Academy GmbH, 2012:18-84.
[74] Chen Tao, Wang Yuting, Zhou Yuegui. Simulation optimization of oxygen-fuel combustion retrofitting of cement production system[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2025, 31(2):181-189.
[75] Huang Guanshuo, Zhou Yuegui. Numerical optimization on the retrofitting of oxy-coal combustion in cement rotary kiln[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2024,49(12):4938-4945.
[76] ARMIN J, KRISTINA F, JOHANNES R, et al. D6.1 Optimized operation of an oxyfuel cement plant [R]. Norway: SINTEF, 2018:1-51.
[77] State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of China. Terms and Definitions of Combustion Modes: GB/T 37650-2019 [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2019.
[78] Jing Huixiang. Experimental Study on Combustion Behavior of Cellulose, Hemicellulose, Lignin and Biomass in Oxygen-Enriched Combustion [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2020: 1-11.
[79] ENGIN B, KAYAHAN U, ATAKÚL H. A comparative study on the air, the oxygen-enriched air and the oxy-fuel combustion of lignites in CFB[J]. Energy, 2020, 196: 117021.
[80] HOKE B C Jr, INSKIP JL. A comparison of oxygen-enhanced combustion technologies[C]//KIEFFER J. 62nd Conference on Glass Problems: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings,2002,23(1):135-151.
[81] Guo Junjun, Zhang Tai, Li Pengfei, et al. Industrial demonstration progress and trend in pulverized coal oxy-fuel combustion in China[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021,41(4):1197-1208, 1526.
[82] Zhang Tian, Yan Kai, Wu Xiaojiang, et al. Effect of flue gas physical properties on convective heat transfer of coal-fired boiler in O2/CO2 atmosphere[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2019,25(1):123-130.
[83] BANNON C, DAMTOFT J, GERAGHTY E, et al. Carbon capture technology-options and potentials for the cement industry[R]. Duesseldorf: European Cement Research Academy, 2007: 15-58.
[84] ALCAZER G, BANNON C, CINTI G, et al. ECRA CCS project report about phase II [R]. Duesseldorf: European Cement Research Academy, 2009:31-43.
[85] ALCAZER G, FERREIRA J, BUZZI L, et al. ECRA CCS project report on phase IV[R]. Duesseldorf: European Cement Research Academy, 2016: 4-44.
[86] BECKER S, MATHAI R, FLEIGER K, et al. D8.1 Status report on calciner technology[R]. Norway: SINTEF, 2018: 1-19.
[87] ANANTHARAMAN R, BERSTAD D, CINTI G, et al. D3.2CEMCAP framework for comparative techno-economic analysis of CO2 capture from cement plants[R]. Norway: SINTEF, 2018: 3-70.
[88] DITARANTO M, BAKKEN J. Study of a full scale oxy-fuel cement rotary kiln[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019,83:166-175.
[89] DITARANTO M, BAKKEN J, BUGGE M, et al. D7.3 Oxyfuel CFD burner and large kiln simulations[R]. Norway: SINTEF,2018:1-27.
[90] CINTI G, PANERU M, MACK A, et al. D8.3 Assessment of calciner test results[R]. Norway: SINTEF,2018: 15-58: 1-14.
[91] CARRASCO F, GRATHWOHL S, MAIER J, et al. D7.2 Oxyfuel burner prototype performance tests[R]. Norway: SINTEF, 2018: 1-30.
[92] Peng Xueping, Chen Changhua, Dai Zhongyuan, et al. Research and demonstration application of oxy-fuel combustion carbon reduction technology and equipment under the dual carbon system in cement industry [J]. Cement Technology,2024,1(5):11-18.
[93] Liu Ning, Cao Yuanhui, Zhang Yani, et al. Current Status of CCUS Technology Development in China‘s Cement Industry [J]. China Cement, 2024(7): 16-20.
[94] “China‘s Climate Change Response Plan (2014-2020)”.
[95] Liu Jing, Wang Lan. Instance analysis on application of alter-native materials to reduce CO2 emissions from cement industry[J]. New Building Materials, 2017,44(7):97-99,118.
[96] He Hongtao, Peng Yi. Effect and application of raw meal substitution and reducing clinker content to reduce CO2 emission[J]. China Cement, 2010, 25(1):63-66.
[97] Zhu Yuanji. Investigation of calcium silicate slag used as cement raw meal[J]. Mining and Metallurgical Engineering,1983 (1):44-47,62.
[98] Xu Yingfang. A study of silicium-caleium slag as raw meal for cement[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1992(1):147-152.
[99] Shi Di, Zhang Wensheng, Ye Jiayuan. Research on Resource Utilization of Silico-Calcium Slag in the Cement Industry [C]//Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Cement and Concrete Chemistry and Application Technology. Cement Technology Fly Ash Application Exchange Conference. Yinchuan: Chinese Ceramic Society, 2013.
[100] Liu Lifen, Zhang Wensheng, Tu Changjiang, et al. Industrial test of producing Portland cement clinker by partially replacing limestone with silicon calcium slag [J]. Ciment, 2015, 42 (3):12-13.
[101] MOTZ H, GEISELER J. Products of steel slags an opportunity to save natural resources [J]. Waste Management,2001,21(3): 285-293.
[102] Ma Yuan, Ma Li. Successful application of quartz sludge as cement raw meal [J]. Cement Technology, 2018,35(4):88-90.
[103] Liu Wei, Zhao Guixiu, Yuan Bao, et al. Discussion on cement production process from papermaking sludge [J]. Cement Engineering,2010, 31(3):85-86.
[104] Lu Juanjuan, Wu Guoming, Ma Zhongcheng, et al. Application of Solid Alternative Fuels in the Cement Industry [J]. Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2023(S0): 76-78.
[105] Rocky Mountain Institute & China Cement Association. (2022). Accelerating deep decarbonization in industry: The path to carbon neutrality in China’s cement sector [Report].
[106] Huaxin Cement. Application Report on Complete Sets of Alternative Fuel Equipment Technology [R]. Wuhan: Huaxin Cement Co., Ltd., 2024.
[107] European Cement Association (CEMBUREAU). Carbon Neutrality Roadmap for the European Cement Industry [R]. 2020.
[108] International Energy Agency (IEA). Global Hydrogen Market Report 2024 [R]. 2024.
[109] Zhang, Y., et al. (2023). Renewable Energy Integration in Cement Plants. Applied Energy, 331, 120458.
[110] Chinese Renewable Energy Society. (2022). China Wind Power Industry Development Report. Beijing: Science Press.
[111] IEA. (2023). Technology Roadmap: Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry.
[112] Conch Cement. (2023). Environmental, Social and Governance Report. Wuhu: Conch Cement Co., Ltd.
[113] Cement Network. Statistics on Photovoltaic Installed Capacity and Investment Data in the Cement Industry [EB/OL].
[114] McKinsey & Company. (2023). Decarbonizing Cement Production. New York: McKinsey.
[115] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022[R]. Abu Dhabi: IRENA, 2023: 78.
[116] BloombergNEF (BNEF). 2023 Energy Storage Market Outlook[R]. New York: Bloomberg Finance L.P., 2023: 45.
x

Related articles:

Issue 07/2024 A³&CO.

Global cement sector decarbonisation

The urgency of decarbonizing the cement sector Cement production is an energy-intensive process that involves the calcination of limestone (calcium carbonate), which releases CO2 as a byproduct....

more
Issue 01/2025 TITAN | ECOCEM

Titan Group and Ecocem to partner for the development of new low-carbon cements in Europe

Titan Group, an international cement and building materials producer, and Ecocem, a leader in low-carbon cement technologies, will partner for the development of innovative low-carbon cements in...

more
Issue 6/2016 THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS AG

thyssenkrupp to supply new cement clinker production line to HeidelbergCement

thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions has received a contract from Heidelberg­Cement AG to supply a new cement clinker production line. The 4500 t/d facility will be built at the Schelklingen plant in...

more
Issue 06/2025 US 2025/0197281 A1

Low-carbon production method and system for cement clinker

(22) 03.03.2023 (43) 19.06.2025 (57) A low-carbon production method and production system for cement clinker. The production method comprises calcining a metal oxide, which is obtained by converting...

more
Issue 6/2022 ONESTONE CONSULTING LTD.

Next-generation carbon capture technologies for cement industries

1 Introduction According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), we are approaching a decisive moment for international efforts to tackle the climate crisis. In its ‘Net Zero by 2050 Scenario’...

more